ICYMI: The Genius community uses the Web Annotator to great effect on Pitchfork

You were notified of this post because it mentioned @pop-genius. You must follow the discussion to get notified of future posts.

Whaddup everyone

This is pretty much an in case you missed it post, but hey, this deserves to be recorded for the ages. The story goes like this: everyone's favorite Condé Nast-owned, "millenial male"-focused music blog, Pitchfork, dropped a pretty negative review of Wet's new album, Don't You.

@annaose, @ez_rag, @babuc and @Prinze_Jr annotated some of the flimsier pronouncements, and it was, I think, an important step in democratizing music discussion. Check out some of the annotations:

http://genius.com/8580022

http://genius.com/8586149

http://genius.com/8583700

http://genius.com/8580187

You can read 'em all here.

But wait, there's more!

Jezebel wrote a confused-sounding blog on the subject, apparently getting mad that people were annotating things to express their own opinion. Needless to say, this got annotated, too. Nice work @babuc @channelPINK @Vesuvius @ez_rag @BennySwans @TheeMurkiness @SwineLord @ewokABdevito @ehmorris @​dalmo @JohnGanz @angelated @darkdoomhoney

http://themuse.jezebel.com/genius-annotates-a-pitchfork-review-and-every-music-cri-1755277152

Both of these pages were super-popular, and represent an important contribution to the big bad world of music criticism, so kudos everyone!

@news-genius @pop-genius


Reply to this email or visit the discussion to respond.
You can unsubscribe from these kinds of emails or change your notification settings.

Related Posts :

0 Response to "ICYMI: The Genius community uses the Web Annotator to great effect on Pitchfork"

Posting Komentar